|
CTO's in the News
A running media report on Harris' re-election platform on mental
health.
Tuesday, January 23, 2001
New funding eases way to mandatory treatment
From Canadian Press
c. 2001, The Toronto Star
The province's Health Ministry announced funding Tuesday aimed
at smoothing the way for a controversial new law allowing seriously
ill psychiatric patients to be forced to accept medical treatment.
Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer said the $15.8 million in new
funding is her ministry's response to the near-unanimous call
for better mental-health care, a call she heard during consultations
for the so-called Brian's Law.
''The key to ensuring effective treatment for patients with serious
mental illness is the need to invest in community-based services,''
Witmer told a news conference at Toronto's Centres for Addiction
and Mental Health.
Brian's Law, or Bill 160 [correction: Bill 68], came into
effect Dec. 1 and is named after Ottawa sportscaster Brian Smith,
who was killed by a mentally ill man in 1995.
The law makes it easier to commit people to psychiatric hospitals
and it introduces community treatment orders - a kind of parole
for psychiatric patients that forces them to comply with prescribed
treatment.
The province says the law will help protect people with serious
mental illness who pose a risk to themselves or others, while
also protecting society and making the streets safer.
Opponents of the law, including mental-health groups, have said
it violates the rights of individuals to refuse treatment. Critics
have also said the law will be meaningless if services to help
the mentally ill integrate into society are not improved.
Witmer's announcement was designed to quell that criticism by
directing the bulk of the money - $13.3 million - toward better
services for mental-health patients outside hospitals: community
care, case management and sessional support for physicians and
psychiatrists.
The money will provide ''a continuum from hospital to community,''
said Witmer.
Dr. Robert Zipursky of the Centres for Addiction and Mental Health
said the funding will enable the law to improve the overall health
of psychiatric patients, while giving them a better base for re-integrating
into the community.
''If you're going to use (community treatment orders), for goodness'
sake, make sure individuals have full access to the range of services
they require to achieve health in the community,'' he said.
Community treatment orders have already been used more than once
since the bill became law Dec. 1, Witmer said.
One patient at the Centres for Addiction signed her own treatment
order forms willingly, while another patient at a different facility
has challenged the order, said Dr. David Goldbloom, physician
in chief for the Centres for Addiction.
A million dollars of the funding will also go to the Ontario
Council of Alternative Businesses to create more job opportunities
for mental health patients, Witmer said.
Another million will also go to the Ontario Mental Health Foundation
to fund research to assist the development of mental-health policies
and programs, and $500,000 will go to the Ontario Federation of
Community and Mental Health Addiction Programs to monitor the
quality of mental health services in Canada.
Thursday, June 22, 2000
Psychiatric 'leash law' under attack
Group argues bill unfair to mentally ill
By Antonella Artuso,
Toronto Sun's Queen's Park Bureau
c. 2000 The Toronto Sun
Psychiatric survivors vow to fight the provincial government's
"leash law" that would force them to take drug therapy
or be institutionalized. "Brian's Law," named for Ottawa
sportscaster Brian Smith who was killed in 1995 by a mentally
ill man, passed third and final reading in the Legislature by
a margin of 82-10.
A smattering of Liberal and NDP members opposed the legislation.
The legislation creates community treatment orders, under which
a seriously mentally ill person could be required to undergo treatment
as a condition of living in the community. The current law allows
authorities to intervene only when there's proof of "imminent"
harm to the patient or others. Brian's Law would broaden the criteria
under which a mentally ill person in crisis could be committed
to a psychiatric facility.
Barry Wilson, a spokesman for Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer,
said the legislation has the support of the Ontario Medical Association
and the Schizophrenia Society of Ontario as well as the majority
of the Legislature.
"This is an example of a bill where there was intensive
public input to ensure a balance between patient rights and the
safety of our communities," Wilson said.
But Lawyer Anita Szigeti, of the Mental Health Legal Committee,
said they will challenge the constitutionality of each community
treatment order in court because the mentally ill will become
the only people under law who can be detained for refusing medication.
"Under Bill 68, you can then become coercively medicated
against your will and in your own home," Szigeti said.
Erick Fabris, a member of the No Force Coalition, said naming
the law after a homicide victim is also unfair to the mentally
ill.
"Unfortunately, our whole group has been painted ... the
very name of the law suggests we are violent," Fabris said.
No date has been set yet for Bill 68 to be proclaimed into law.
March 23, 2000
Mental health changes on way
New powers can force the sick into treatment
By Caroline Mallan
Toronto Star Queen's Park Bureau Chief
c. 2000, The Toronto Star
Police and health professionals will get more power this spring
to force the mentally ill into treatment, Health Minister Elizabeth
Witmer says.
She announced yesterday that proposed legislative changes will
be open to public discussion for two weeks early next month before
final changes are brought forward.
"We need to ensure that the rights of the seriously mentally
ill patients are protected but we also need to ensure that public
safety is protected as well,'' Witmer said of the changes.
The proposals include plans for community treatment orders, a
parole-type system whereby patients with a history of chronic
rehospitalization would live in the community but would be required
to report in regularly with the mental health system and possibly
take prescribed medication. Failure to take medications would
result in a return to hospital.
A substitute decision-maker, likely a family member, will be chosen
if the patient is deemed incapable.
Calls for changes to mental health laws came after several high
profile incidents involving the mentally ill.
In February, 1997, Edmond Yu, a schizophrenic who was not taking
medication, was shot dead by police on a bus. Yu was holding a
hammer when he was gunned down.
In March, 1997, 2-year-old Zachary Antidormi of Hamilton was stabbed
and killed by a mentally ill neighbour while being pulled in a
wagon near his home by a friend. The 60-year-old woman with a
history of mental illness was found not criminally responsible
for the boy's death.
And in September, 1997, Herbert Cheong, a man with a 20-year history
of mental illness, pushed a complete stranger, 23-year-old Charlene
Minkowski of Mississauga, beneath the wheels of a subway train.
Witmer stressed that the new laws would not be an attack on the
vulnerable mentally ill, but rather an effort to get them help
at an early stage in their illness.
She said the changes are in response to the requests she has heard
from family members and health-care professionals, and all will
include a rigourous appeal process that the patients can access.
The proposed changes would remove the requirement that police
officers ``observe'' first hand disorderly behaviour in cases
where they believe the person might need to be committed for treatment.
Some in the mental health field oppose the changes, saying that
they will cause the most seriously ill to run and hide from formal
health care and that drugs are not a cure-all for the mentally
ill since they fail in more than 30 per cent of cases.
But Ted Fielding of the Schizophrenia Society of Ontario, where
Witmer made her announcement, said the society supports the new
laws and does not believe the aim is to lock unwilling patients
in psychiatric wards.
``The consumer/survivor people generally are people who have not
suffered from schizophrenia and their concern is that they will
somehow be swept up into this net,'' he said of some people who
have recovered from bouts of mental illness and feel their freedom
will be at risk under the new laws.
Dr. Stephen Connell of the Coalition of Ontario Psychiatrists
said it strikes the right balance for patients and the community.
Chris Higgins, executive director of the Ontario Federation of
Community Mental health and Addiction Programs, said he opposes
the changes because he feels they will further alienate high-risk
people from the health care system.
``People who need help are not going to come for help if they
fear they're going to lose their freedom,'' said Higgins.
``Edmond Yu had retreated from the formal mental health system.''
Saskatchewan is the sole province in Canada with community treatment
orders, although British Columbia has laws with a similar purpose.
New Brunswick considered them in 1998, but - following a provincial
consultation - decided to put greater resources into other community
supports.
March 22, 2000
Press
Release From the Ontario Ministry of Health:
Ontario to introduce stronger mental health law
this spring to help patients and protect communities
(See the No Force Coalition's Response
Press Release)
The Ontario government will introduce stronger mental health
laws this spring to make sure people with serious mental illness
get the treatment they need, announced Health and Long-Term Care
Minister Elizabeth Witmer today.
"We are now following through on our Blueprint election
commitment to make sure that people with serious mental illness
who pose a danger to themselves or to others are getting the treatment
they need," said Witmer. Brad Clark, Parliamentary Assistant
to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care and MPP for Stoney
Creek, will lead consultations on the government's proposed amendments
to the Mental Health Act and the Health Care Consent Act, in Toronto,
Ottawa, Kingston, London, Hamilton, Thunder Bay and Sudbury.
"Some people who are mentally ill are not getting the help
they need," said Witmer. "Our government will introduce
changes to the law that will help families and health professionals
make sure their loved ones and patients get care and treatment."
Dr. Stephen Connell of the Coalition of Ontario Psychiatrists
welcomed the government's announcement. "This is the next
step in building a modern mental health system that provides safe,
effective care, treatment and support for individuals who have
a mental illness," Connell said.
"We are taking responsible action to balance the needs of
patients with public safety," said Brad Clark. Input gathered
from the consultations will assist in the design of legislation
that will support a comprehensive and integrated mental health
system. The government is moving forward with its Blueprint commitment
to propose legislative changes that will ensure that people with
serious mental illness get the care and treatment they need in
a community-based system.
The proposed changes will remove barriers to families, police
and social workers in order to ensure that people posing a risk
to themselves or others get the care and treatment they need.
This will include proposed amendments to the Mental Health Act
and related legislation to support implementation of community
treatment orders.
Community treatment orders/leave agreements are a legal mechanism
by which a physician recommends treatment be provided in the community
for a person with serious mental illness, with the person's consent.
If the person is incapable of consenting to treatment, authorization
is given by a substitute decision-maker. The ministry will be
consulting with mental health stakeholders to ensure the successful
design and implementation of proposed amendments to the legislation.
Initiatives
- The government is creating the basis for a comprehensive system
of mental health services that is more accessible. Listed below
are major government initiatives in mental health policy reform,
expanded forensic mental health capacity and the steps taken
to improve integration of the mental health system since 1995:
- Then-Parliamentary Assistant Dan Newman, MPP Scarborough
Centre, conducted a review of mental health reform strategy,
releasing the results in June 1998 as 2000 and Beyond: Strengthening
Ontario's Mental Health System
- Mental Health Law Education Project was developed to inform
Ontarians, especially professionals, about their rights and
responsibilities under existing mental health legislation
- Making It Happen(1999), provincial mental health reform implementation
strategy and service guidelines, released with benchmarks, performance
measures, and an accountability framework
- Mental Health Implementation Task Forces established in northeastern
and northwestern Ontario with a commitment to establish task
forces in other regions of the province
- A Provincial Strategy to Coordinate Human Services and Justice
Systems, a provincial forensic policy is developed
- 446 new forensic beds opened across the province with another
144 beds to be opened as part of the expanded regional forensic
programs
- Review of the Mental Health Act and related legislation to
ensure a mental health service delivery system is accessible,
accountable , cost-effective, and promotes public safety
- Recommendations developed for a comprehensive housing policy
for people with serious mental illness and an inter-ministerial
committee set up to deal with supportive housing issues
- 84 supportive housing programs designated for people with
a serious mental illness has been transferred to the Ministry
of Health and Long-Term Care from the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing
- 25 per cent increase in per diem funding for clients in Homes
for Special Care
- The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health is established
with four Toronto locations
Support increased for the Consent and Capacity Board and the
Ontario Review Board through increased funding and increased accountability
through new Memoranda of Understanding
Investments
Since 1995, the government has reinvested $150 million in mental
health care services:
- $19.1 million to expand community-based mental health services
to a total of 51 Assertive Community Treatment Teams (ACTTs)
and to enhance court diversion, psychogeriatric outreach; case
management and crisis support services
- $23.5 million for Community Investment Funding (CIF) to establish
and enhance ACTTs, case management, family support and crisis
response services across the province
- $60 million for additional mental health beds and increased
community-based services, including ACTTs, case management,
family support and crisis services
- $45 million to provide housing support and mental health care
supports and services for homeless individuals
- $2.5 million for hard to reach, socially isolated people with
serious mental illness in Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton and London
February 1, 2000
Community Treatment Orders Coming in June 2000
Original source:
http://www.canoe.ca/OntQueTicker/CANOE-wire.Mental-Health-Act.html
TORONTO (CP) -- Proposed changes to Ontario's Mental Health Act
might make it easier to force the mentally ill into treatment
but could violate patient rights and won't necessarily make the
streets safer, critics say.
In last June's election campaign, the governing Tories promised
to change laws so that anyone who poses a danger to themselves
or others could be removed from the streets and forced into care.
Ontario's doctors are also urging Health Minister Elizabeth
Witmer to give them the right to force patients to accept
treatment after they leave hospital -- essentially a sort of parole.
But Glenn Thompson of the Canadian Mental Health Association
says it's discriminatory to forcibly treat the mentally ill if
they aren't dangerous to others. "There are lots of people
who are a danger to themselves, such as smokers," Thompson
argues, adding that the success of forced treatment is debatable
.
But Dr. Richard O'Reilly, a London, Ont. psychiatrist,
who helped articulate the doctors' proposal, calls that "an
extreme libertarian point of view" that risks neglect of
the severely mentally ill. "Individuals lose the ability
to understand they are ill," O'Reilly said in an interview.
They cannot make an informed decision." Those individuals
can be "really tortured by delusions" and it would be
wrong to allow them to languish in the community without proper
care, O'Reilly said.
Witmer, who intends to introduce legislation in June after further
consultations, said Tuesday she recognizes the issue is a tricky
one. "What we need to do is balance the rights of patients
with the safety of the public. That's why the consultation will
be quite informative."
David Goldbloom, a psychiatry professor at the University of
Toronto, says he doesn't think the proposed changes will have
a "profound impact" on making the streets safer. "The
problems of violence are not going to be resolved by treatment
orders," Goldbloom said. The changes proposed by the Ontario
Medical Association and Ontario Psychiatric Association
will only have meaning if there's "a well-funded system of
community supports in place," he said.
Witmer said the government has spent an additional $150 million
since 1995 on expanding mental-health services and community-based
care. "We want to ensure that any reform does bring about
smooth transition from the institution to the community,"
she added.
Janice Wiggins of the Schizophrenia Society of Ontario
said she welcomed the proposed changes but conceded "there
is no absolute guarantee the streets would be safer." She
also stressed the need for proper community supports for the mentally
ill."More and more families from across Ontario say they
can't get a bed for their relative when it's desperately needed."
October 22, 1999
Health care to receive $3.8 billion injection
But nurses say support for them is still lacking
By Theresa Boyle
Toronto Star Queen's Park Bureau
c. 1999 The Toronto Star
The Ontario government is committed to spending an additional
$3.8 billion on health care, which it calls ``its most urgent
concern.'' The government also promised in its throne speech
yesterday to introduce a Patient's Bill of Rights,
guarantee 60 hours of hospital care for new mothers and
amend controversial mental health laws.
Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer said later that spending will
jump by 20 per cent to $22.7 billion by 2004 from current levels.
``The financial commitment the government has made reflects
the fact that this is the No. 1 issue and we want to ensure
that health services are there and accessible for all Ontarians,''
she said. This year, the government is spending $18.9 billion
on health care, the highest level in Ontario history, representing
34 per cent of the budget. In the run-up to the election last
June, polls consistently rated health care as the most pressing
problem for Ontarians.
``Making sure that every person in Ontario has access to top-quality
health care is your government's most urgent concern,'' the
throne speech read. The speech noted that the population is
aging and the cost of medical care is growing. But it went on
to say that money alone is not the answer to creating a better
health care system. ``Tough decisions have been made and are
still necessary to build and sustain a modern health care system.
. . . More must be done to ensure that every dollar spent on
health care is spent effectively,'' the speech said.
Many of the promises were part of the Conservatives' election
platform. These included the Patients Bill of Rights,
which will ensure access to health services, full information
on one's health record and respect for privacy and amendments
to mental health laws "that stand in the way of families,
police and social workers, to ensure people posing a danger
to themselves or others get the care they need.''
The Liberal caucus chuckled when Lieutenant-Governor Hilary
Weston read a passage from the speech, promising free tuition
to students entering medical school, provided they move and
practise for five years in under-serviced areas.
The Tories borrowed the idea from the Liberals' election platform.
'`I'm delighted to see that they saw some of the light by adopting
a proposal that we put forward,'' Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty
said. He criticized the speech for not addressing financial
problems faced by hospitals and the resulting delays in services.
`How come half of our hospitals are running deficits?'' he asked.
``There was no reference to the fact that we are still sending
people south fo the border for cancer treatment,'' McGuinty
added.
NDP Leader Howard Hampton charged that the Tories are
misleading Ontarians by boasting that health care spending is
at record levels. The level of health care spending per capita
has actually fallen by more than $75 in the last six years,
he said. ''As the population has been growing, the per-capita
investment in health care has actually been dropping. On a per-capita
basis, Ontario is investing less in health care now than it
did in 1993 or '94. . . And it's going to continue to drop,''
he said.
Barb Wahl, president of the Ontario Nurses' Association,
said she was disappointed the throne speech was short on commitments
to front-line health care workers. She accused the Tories of
reneging on a pre-election promise of hiring 12,000 more nurses.
'`I am concerned about what wasn't in the throne speech today
for nurses. We heard nothing about supports for nurses,'' she
said. She noted that the Lake of the Woods Hospital in Kenora
has cancelled elective surgery for three weeks because of a
nursing shortage. ``What about the front-line nurses who are
in such a short supply? Nurses in nursing homes are looking
after 90 patients alone at night,'' Wahl said.
For anyone wishing to wade through it the entire Throne Speech
is available online at http://www.ontla.on.ca/hansard/37_parl/session1/L002_1.htm#L1
June 16, 1999
Mental health laws changing
Must balance public and patient rights: Witmer By Theresa Boyle
Toronto Star Queen's Park Bureau
c. 1999 The Toronto Star
Ontario will have to strike a ``delicate balance'' between
respecting civil liberties and protecting society when it introduces
legislation making it easier to treat dangerous mentally ill
people, Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer says.
``We will strike a balance between individual rights and public
safety. We will treat our social responsibility seriously toward
families, the community and above all, toward those citizens
who need our humane attention,'' Witmer told the 24th International
Congress on Law and Mental Health at the University of Toronto
yesterday.
The Conservative government campaigned on a promise to introduce
``community treatment orders'' or ``outpatient committal'' to
ensure people who pose a danger to themselves or others can
be taken off the streets to get the care they need.
Families of the mentally ill and many doctors have long argued
such measures are needed. Variations of outpatient commitment
and community treatment orders exist in British Columbia, Saskatchewan,
36 American states and New Zealand.
But critics argue treatment orders are too coercive and give
too much power to doctors and the police. They fear that power
could be abused.
``We are fully aware of the debate surrounding outpatient committal
and community treatment but we feel that we will not benefit
society by retreating from the hard questions that must be answered.''
Witmer said her government will release a discussion paper
soon on amending mental health legislation.
"Given our commitment to public safety and access to services
for the seriously mentally ill, we will ensure that the law
does not stand in the way of patients receiving the treatment
they require,'' she said.
She told the gathering that mental health reform is a priority
for her government. The province is in the process of closing
six of 10 provincial psychiatric hospitals and making a massive
reinvestment into community supports.
Dr. Rachel Jenkins, of the Institute of Psychiatry in London
and an adviser to the World Health Organization, said Ontario
is not alone in the challenges it faces.
She said stigma, caused by fear and ignorance about mental
illness, is at the root of these challenges.
`It results in an enormous lack of attention from the public''
and, in turn, in a lack of public resources, she said.
Jenkins said there are many ``pernicious myths'' about mental
disorders. Some people do not believe they are ``real'' illnesses
and others think they are caused by addictions.
``This is why we need an explicit national mental health policy
in every country,'' Jenkins said.
There is no such policy in Canada, noted Steve Lurie of the
Canadian Mental Health Association.
`We've been trying to get the federal government interested
in one for at least two years,'' he said.
``With the infusion of federal dollars into health, it would
be in the federal government's best interest to ensure that
the one in five Canadians with mental health problems gets decent
care and support.''
The week-long conference will hear from more than 500 speakers
at 100 separate sessions.
This story presents some of the internal politics surrounding the
Tories' move towards CTO's. It suggests who has been calling for such
laws in Ontario and the turf wars that have developed as a result
of lobbyists themselves becoming political figures.
May 14, 1999
Tories promise mental health bill
Harris favours forced treatment in some cases
By Joel Ruimy
Toronto Star Queen's Park Bureau Chief
c. 1999 The Toronto Star
The Progressive Conservatives have vowed to pass legislation
forcing the mentally ill into treatment even if they don't want
it.
But yesterday's campaign promise got off to a shaky start when
Premier Mike Harris was unable to give details about how he would
expand Ontario's already strained network of mental-health facilities.
And there was a minor embarrassment for the Conservatives: they
quoted the former president of the Schizophrenia Society of Ontario
in their campaign release, only to learn she is now the Liberal
candidate in Niagara Falls.
Selina Volpatti said she wants an apology from the Tories for
quoting her without her permission. She added that she is running
for the Liberals because the Tories have done nothing about the
issue over the last four years.
But despite the political stumbles, Harris appeared resolute
during a campaign meeting in Toronto with a half-dozen members
of the Schizophrenia
Society of Ontario.
``The suffering of untreated mentally ill people is a real problem,''
he told reporters after meeting with one man who told of hearing
messages from aliens and with a woman whose schizophrenic husband
shot their teenage son to death several years ago.
``For too long, we've given up on the mentally ill, some of whom
do end up on our streets. We feel there sometimes is little we
can do to help and we pretend that a problem doesn't exist.''
At present, provincial laws require that a person be an immediate
threat to themselves or others before they can be forced into treatment.
The Tories would change the law to make it easier to institutionalize
such people.
Asked where all those people would be treated - an estimated
100,000 Ontarians have or could develop schizophrenia - Harris
was unable to offer details. ``That's going to be part of the
challenge . . . we are going to have to provide more resources,''
including earmarking a greater share of the province's $19 billion
health-care budget for treatment for the mentally ill.
The plan has set off alarm bells from some who say it could be
used to clear the streets of beggars, squeegee kids and others
who, while not mentally ill, could be viewed as undesirable.
``We'll have to make sure that the legislation is to be aimed at
those who will make a decision on behalf of individuals who cannot,''
Harris said at a news conference. ``It can't be an arbitrary type
of thing,'' he added.
After Harris left the campaign event yesterday, Schizophrenia
Society president Ted Fielding said he was pleased with Harris'
commitment.
Asked about his having served as an apparent campaign prop, Fielding,
who has an adult schizophrenic daughter, answered:
``I'm not concerned that we're being used. If they do what we want
them to do, that's fine with us. We don't care which party introduces
the legislation.''
The following story was a surprise to some. Until that time, there
was very little public attention given to mental health except the
Yu Inquest and the receding memory of subway pushings (though only
half were perpetrated by psychiatric survivors, and of these, the
first pusher actually wanted treatment but was refused).
April 30, 1999
Laws to target mentally ill
Will allow forced treatment for people in danger By Theresa Boyle
Toronto Star Staff Reporter
c. 1999 The Toronto Star
The Progressive Conservatives are promising to ensure
mentally ill people considered dangerous will comply with prescribed
treatment regimens.
The party's election platform outlines plans to "change the laws
that stand in the way of families, police and social workers so
that people who pose a danger to themselves or others can be taken
off the streets to get the care they need."
That would mean the introduction of community treatment orders
that have been advocated by numerous coroner's juries probing
tragic deaths involving the mentally ill. These include, most
recently, the inquest into the death of Edmond Yu, a paranoid
schizophrenic shot by police in 1997.
``The reality is we're responding to the needs of individuals
who (require) assistance. A very significant part of what needs
to be done is that these people need to be helped and (have) treatment
provided for them,'' Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer said yesterday.
While many families and doctors hailed the announcement, advocates
for the mentally ill said they are alarmed.
``It sounds like this government is declaring war on the poor
and the homeless and the mentally ill,'' charged lawyer Suzan
Fraser, who represented the Queen Street Patients Council at the
Yu inquest.
``Any time you force people to take mind-altering drugs against
their will, it infringes on their charter rights,'' she said.
The Tory platform says people end up on the streets for many
reasons. ``Many of them need medical or psychiatric help, but
are refusing it or can't understand their own problems.''
It goes on to say that existing mental health legislation is
inadequate because it ``makes it very hard to put people into
care, even if they are suffering from serious mental illness,
or alcohol or drug addiction that makes them a danger to themselves
and other people.''
Dr. Stephen Connell, of the Coalition of Ontario Psychiatrists,
said his organization is pleased about the government's ``sensitivity''
toward the mentally ill.
This story covers the Tory plan before they knew thwe politics
in the mental health world. They were willing to implement reforms
long sought after by liberals in the field, namely more community
supports for the mentally ill. But there's no mention of CTO's here.
Psychiatric survivors had watched the Liberals introduce CTO Bills
78 and 111, and knew it was only a matter of time until CTOs became
a Tory platform.
March 16, 1999
Mental health reforms touted
Services becoming better co-ordinated, Yu inquest told By Theresa
Boyle
Toronto Star Health Reporter
c. 1999 The Toronto Star
The provincial government has developed a mental health reform
plan that better co-ordinates services and offers more community
supports to ensure people like Edmond Yu don't fall through
the cracks, an inquest into his death has been told.
``Consumers and families tell us how difficult it is to access
service. There is no map to the system,'' Catherine Brown, a
policy co-ordinator with the health ministry, testified yesterday.
``One of the biggest problems . . . is that the linkages aren't
there. That's what allows people to fall through the gap. We
are asking (for services) to be linked as closely as possible,
so the system is seamless and consumers can move through the
different levels as easily as possible.''
The coroner's inquest is examining Ontario's mental health
system and police alternatives to the use of lethal force. Yu,
35, was shot on a TTC bus Feb. 20, 1997, by Toronto Constable
Lou Pasquino after he threatened officers with a hammer. Police
were cleared of wrongdoing by the province's special investigations
unit.
Yesterday, the jury was shown a draft copy of the ``Making
It Happen'' report, which the province has yet to formally release.
It is different from other reform strategies attempted since
de-institutionalization of the mental health system began in
the 1960s, because it sets out concrete steps to get long-held
but stalled initiatives off the ground, Brown said.
Health Minister Elizabeth Witmer last year directed the creation
of a new strategy, recognizing ``there wasn't enough action
taking place'' on recommendations in previous reports, she said.
For example, a strategy released by the then-NDP government
in 1993 called for a significant shift from institutional to
community care over 10 years. But the province was behind on
targets set in that report. One reason was that mental health
planning was losing out in the competition with other health
initiatives, Brown said. The mentally ill were often unable
to fight for their needs, she said.
The new strategy addresses that problem by creating about seven
mental health task forces throughout the province that would
be responsible for assessing the needs of the mentally ill in
various communities, devising service-delivery plans and ensuring
those plans are implemented.
For example, they would make sure discharge plans are in place
for those leaving hospital and that individuals with serious
mental illnesses have case managers or a team of workers to
help them with everything from housing to medical treatment.
The inquest has heard there were numerous gaps in the system
that contributed to Yu's downfall. The new strategy would ``ensure
people don't get lost,'' Brown said.
The mental health system is made up of more than 300 community
mental health programs, 59 general hospital psychiatric units
and 10 psychiatric hospitals, six of which are earmarked for
closing.
home / QSPC
/ QSOS
about NFC / about CTOs
pamphlets / ctos
in the news / letters to MPP's
|