 |
Recovery
The text below is based on the QSOS pamphlet on recovery
(2001). See our pamphlet in the following languages:

French
/ Spanish
/ Vietnamese
/ Chinese
Note: the following is intended to provide general information
only. If you need medical advice, you should speak with your
doctor or other health professionals.
Mental illness is still seen as a lifelong disease
that has no cure. But over the last three decades, more attention
has been paid to studies and stories about people coping and
recovering from 'symptoms' like depression, anxiety, mood
swings, 'delusions' and hallucinations. People 'recover' in
all sorts of ways, and the journey is never simple, but even
if we describe recovery simply as finding work, living independently,
and keeping social contacts without experiencing symptoms,
it may be acheived without drugs as Jonathan Nash showed us
(see
article).

Since 1988, psychiatric survivor Pat Deegan, PhD, has been
telling professionals and others that people recover with
basic friendly support alone. This is supported by much evidence,
as Dr. Courtenay Harding, psychiatrist and professor, shows
in numerous studies. It is estimated that one half to two
thirds of people get much better or fully recover from 'chronic
schizophrenia'. In 1979, the World Health Organization concluded
that people in 'developing' countries recover more quickly
than in countries with more hospitals and medications.7
Because people often recover more fully without medications,
Dr. Harding says, "Systems of treatment are not as yet
able to cure, but they should be able to remove the obstacles
that stand in the way of natural self-healing processes."3
In the last few years, people who have experienced the mental
health system have started operating peer-run services to
support each other. Some professionals have responded by moving
towards 'client-centred care' and 'empowering consumers'.
William Anthony, PhD, says that recovery is a new way of working
in mental health that may revolutionize the field, though
old habits die hard.1
Diagnostic textbooks predict that natural recovery from mental
illness' like 'schizophrenia' is near impossible, so the concept
of recovery is important whether the system can change or
not. Psychiatric drug treatment is often used to control some
symptoms, and patients are told to expect less in life, that
they might not be able to work or hold meaningful relationships.
Add to this the isolation and stigma of a psychiatric diagnosis
that can leave people open to discrimination and many forms
of abuse. In this context recovery is an important way of
changing beliefs and attitudes.
Recovery
Without Treatment: NY Times
Though recovery is possible, most people believe schizophrenia
is an incurable genetic disease that needs medicating. No
physical markers for schizophrenia, let alone the genes responsible,
have yet been found. Research on identical twins shows less
than half of them present schizophrenic symptoms in both twins.
Its also said that the mentally ill have a high risk
of passing on the illness to their children by example. Karl-Erik
Wahlberg, a researcher in Finland, found in a nation-wide
study that children of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia
do not develop mental illness when adopted by nurturing families.9
Genetics may be important, but environment seems to play a
bigger role than was once believed.
Recovery
in the Mainstream: US News
If environment is key, what helps a person recover? A supportive
friend or helper who listens without judgement, who believes
in you during hard times, can be more helpful than professionally
trained staff. According to studies done by Dr. Loren Mosher,
people in small, inexpensive "safe houses", with
no trained staff or medication, are able to reduce psychotic
symptoms within six weeks6
(his work is now being repeated in Switzerland, Sweden and
Germany). After 2 years in a "safe house", 58% of
people were living independently (as opposed to 33% of people
from hospital wards), and 32% were working full-time (in higher-status
occupations compared to those from hospital).
A diagnosis of severe and persistent mental illness doesnt
have to mean "forever". If a person believes they
can recover, and someone is willing to assist and nurture
that belief, the odds of recovery are very strong.

Some Further Reading and Sources
1. Anthony, W. A. (2000). A recovery-oriented service system:
Setting some system level standards. Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Journal. 24 (2): 159-168.
2. Bassman, R. (2001). Overcoming the impossible:
My journey through schizophrenia. Psychology Today. 34 (1):
34-40.
3. Harding, C. M., Brooks, G. W., Takamaru,
A., Strauss, J. S., & Breier, A. (1987b). The Vermont
longitudinal study of Persons with severe mental illness,
I: Methodology, study sample, and overall status 32 years
later. Am. J. Psychiatry, 144 (6): 718-726.
4. Harding, C. M., Zubin, J., & Strauss,
J. S. (1987a). Chronicity in schizophrenia: Fact, partial
fact, or artifact? Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 38 (5):
477-486.
5. Mental Health Weekly. (1999). New York
moves toward recovery model with RFP release for special-needs
plans. July 26. Manisses Communications Group.
6. Mosher, L. R., Vallone, R., & Menn,
A. (1995). The treatment of acute psychosis without neuroleptics:
Six weeks psychopathology outcome data from the Soteria Project.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 41 (3): 157-173.
7. World Health Organization, (1979) Schizophrenia:
An international follow-up study. New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
8. De Girolamo, D. (1995). World Health Organization
Studies on Schizophrenia: An overview of their results and
their implications for an understanding of the disorder. The
Psychotherapy Patient. 9: 213-31.
9. Wahlberg, K. E., Wynne, L. C., Oja, H.,
Keskitalo, P., et al,. (1997). Gene-environment interaction
in vulnerability to schizophrenia: Findings from the Finnish
Family Study of Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry.
Vol. 154 (3): 355-362.
See our
links.
home / recovery
/ rights / readings
/ links / feedback
/ QSOS
/ QSPC archive
|